Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1995-05-08 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1995-05-08 House Journal Page 1989 HJR 48 The following was read the second time: HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 48 Requesting that the Federal Subsistence Board not adopt the proposed subsistence moose hunting regulations for the Kenai Peninsula, not adopt any other federal regulation changes for hunting or fishing on the Kenai Peninsula, and not adopt the changes in federal regulations that make a customary and traditional use determination for certain communities on the Kenai Peninsula. 1995-05-08 House Journal Page 1990 HJR 48 with the: Journal Page RES RPT CS(RES) NT 2DP 4NR 1911 ZERO FISCAL NOTE (F&G) 1912 Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original resolution: CS FOR HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 48(RES) Requesting that the Federal Subsistence Board not adopt the proposed subsistence moose hunting regulations for the Kenai Peninsula, and refrain, until January 1, 1997, from adopting federal regulations that would grant subsistence preferences for fish or game or changing any customary and traditional use determinations. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Masek: Page 1, line 2 (title amendment): Delete "Kenai Peninsula" Insert "State of Alaska" Page 1, line 7: Delete "Kenai Peninsula" Insert "State of Alaska" Page 1, line 16: Delete "Kenai Peninsula" Insert "State of Alaska" Page 2, line 2: Delete "Kenai Peninsula" Insert "State of Alaska" Page 2, line 6: Delete "Kenai Peninsula" Insert "State of Alaska" 1995-05-08 House Journal Page 1991 HJR 48 Page 2, lines 11 & 12: Delete "Kenai Peninsula" Insert "State of Alaska" Page 2, line 17: Delete "Kenai Peninsula" Insert "State of Alaska" Representative Masek moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Navarre objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHJR 48(RES) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Barnes, Hanley, Kelly, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Rokeberg, Therriault Nays: Austerman, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Ivan, James, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Mackie, MacLean, Navarre, Nicholia, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Sanders, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Absent: Finkelstein, Moses And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 (title amendment) was offered by Representative MacLean: Page 1, line 3, after "regulations", through line 4: Delete all material. Insert "." 1995-05-08 House Journal Page 1992 HJR 48 Representative MacLean moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHJR 48(RES) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 35 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brown, Grussendorf, MacLean, Martin Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Mackie, Masek, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHJR48(RES) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Representative MacLean objected. The question being: "Shall CSHJR 48(RES) be advanced to third reading on the same day?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHJR 48(RES) Second Reading Advance to Third Reading YEAS: 38 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 1995-05-08 House Journal Page 1993 HJR 48 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Mackie, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Nays: MacLean Absent: Moses And so, the motion passed. CSHJR 48(RES) was read the third time. Representative Masek rose to a point of order regarding confining remarks to the resolution before the body. The Speaker stated the point was well taken. The question being: "Shall CSHJR48(RES) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHJR 48(RES) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 36 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Mackie, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Nays: MacLean, Martin, Masek Absent: Moses And so, CSHJR48(RES) passed the House. 1995-05-08 House Journal Page 1994 HJR 48 Representative Navarre gave notice of reconsideration of his vote on CSHJR 48(RES).